data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cf098/cf098a5d01164ed49acd4dfce755eaf87db3650b" alt="" |
|
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cf098/cf098a5d01164ed49acd4dfce755eaf87db3650b" alt="" |
Subject: From: URL: E-mail: |
Re: Re: Hmmm... (Sun May 19 17:17:49 2002
)
Yann Stettler [View profile
]
http://www.animanga.com/cels/sale
stettler@animanga.com
|
|
> I wonder if you guys think that Rick Alonso is
> just claiming to have the rights to the D cels
> when he really doesn't and it is all a big
> conspiracy.
No, of course not! :) But an exclusivity is not a
law : it's a commercial agreement between a
manufacturer of a produce and a distributor. It
only mean that the manufacturer will only provide
some produces to that given distributor and no
other.
It absolutly doesn't mean that others dealers
don't have the right to sell the produces. It only
mean that "the manufacturer should not sell to
them".
In the case of VHD cel, it's a fact that the
studio released a couple hundred cels for
promotional purpose. Even Mr. Alonso admit that.
How is anybody supposed to guess that a given cel
is not one of those ?
And can't there be any other sources for cels ?
Take a totaly hypotical situation in which an
employee at executive level (which can make
decision for the company) of one of the companies
owning the cels decided not to respect the
exclusivity (knowingly or not) and sell to some
others dealers...
Such cels are not stolen. And it doesn't concern
at all the dealers who buy them. That only involve
the manufacturer and the person/company that get
the exclusivity.
But naturaly this is a totaly hypotetical
situation which can't have anything to do with the
reality. Who would ever believe something like
that may happen ? Just put this on the alcool I
drunk at lunch...
Cheers,
Yann Stettler |
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/98465/98465608fbc67465c47962082f2054de6128cb3c" alt="" |
Message thread :
|