If the possibility of someone taking the images 
of your cels from your online gallery concerns 
you, they why risk it by having an online 
gallery? I am all for sharing in public and I do 
so with people I trust and respect. But when you 
put you anything in the web, you literally are 
placing the images of your hard-earned treasures 
into a lawless space. You may not like it, but 
you’ve accepted that risk.

I won’t touch any presumptions regarding 
intellectual copyrights and/or international 
copyright law. But I will say this, many of us 
are equally guilty of copying images from other 
people’s galleries, the difference is, most of us 
do not compile them and then repost them. At the 
very least this individual is willing to remove 
the images if you contact them, be thankful for 
that much cooperation. They do not have to, nor 
are they obligated to hunt down each and every 
single owner at the time they copied the image 
and request permission. If they do so, great, but 
it's a courtesy, not a written or enforcable law.
And as for the ISP removing their gallery and/or 
ending their service -you can dream- it’s not 
likely. Why? Maybe b/c this person is not selling 
anything; afterall the compiler of the images is 
not making any profit whatsoever by reposting 
images. The ISP usually could careless. As far as 
they are concerned, there is little difference 
from what this person is doing anymore so than 
someone creating a homepage of links and images 
taken from the web.

Lastly, if you still don’t feel safe even after 
adding watermarks, shrinking the resolution and 
size of your images, then strongly reconsider 
sharing a gallery online. This is precisely why 
people -myself included- do not create one. Keep 
in mind, even if you add html codes to preventing 
copying of images like on RS, this is temporary 
at best and there are numerous ways to circumvent 
this for those who are willing to do the work.