Nick says that her IP matches the person who 
tried (on this board) to say that Anime Chaos's  
cel shop closing was the result of her lawsuit. 
A lawsuit which never existed.

Now she's trying to say that she got bad service 
from his DEPUTY service. Seems a bit too fishy 
to me. Isn't it just a bit too convienient that 
her posts were 'deleted'? Hence offering no 
proof that she actually posted them in the first 
place?

She has no hard evidence that what she says 
happened, happened. She's just trying to start 
trouble. Nick, on the other hand, has the IP.