Ooo, now that's a good idea, about high-quality
copies. While I agree that it's not *quite* the
same, it's the closest way to achieve the same
effect without endangering the real thing. And
that would also allow for higher-quality pieces
to be on display, and if damage *was* incurred
(ie, from light sources, from air particles, etc)
it's no major loss.
It's what we often did for exhibits. :o) We'd
often have a perfect photograph to illustrate a
point, or a wonderful newspaper clip we wanted to
display in conjunction with such-and-such. But to
keep from damaging the original by mounting and
displaying it, we'd make very good copies and
work with those. That way, the public got to see
what we wanted to show them, and we didn't have
to wring our hands in anguish over hacking up
collection objects. ;o)
What a lovely suggestion! :o)
-Cres |