If the domain name is supposed to be blocked for 
one month prior to being resold, how is it 
possible that the Usagi's House site was active - 
and was even updated - within the past week and 
now it is taken by someone else?

Unless this is a case of the domain name actually 
being registered under the ISP's name (read: not 
the name of the person who uses it) and the 
warnings were sent to the ISP, who never passed 
on any of them? (What Heather meant by the ISP 
not notifying her?) But that would seem foolish 
and/or bad business on the part of the ISP, who 
is actually proxy owning the name for someone 
else. . .

Or maybe I'm off entirely? I'm just curious, 
since I don't know a lot about how the burocracy 
of the whole thing, and yet I'm the one who's 
supposed to keep my office's website up and 
running. o_0;  (And I know that our domain name 
is not actually owned by my boss, but by his ISP.)

Many Sharp Smiles,
--Drac